The
last chapter of Ether is one that totally mystifies my thinking. How does one get to the point of such anger
and hate that their very lives are of no value over the intense need to destroy
another person? I understand anger and
how it can turn your focus into a non-stop pursuit of getting even. But would I ever have let it take me down the
road to hand-to-hand combat realizing that one of us would be dead when it was
over?
We
see this type of anger on the news every night.
We hear about murder/suicides of couples. We hear of the troubles in the Middle East
and their determination to kill the American infidels. We see bullying among young people that
oft-times result in suicide. We see
cyber bullying that is causing a great deal of destruction. Obviously, I don’t and never have felt that
kind of hate and desire to injure another.
Even the only one person in this world that I temporarily had anger
toward I have come to be terms with and we’re quite civil toward one
another. I’m grateful my hate and anger
did not poison me to the point of no return as the people in Ether
experienced. “. . . drunk as with wine.
. .” is how Ether worded it. This is so
truly sad and pitiful.
So
the question comes: How does one avoid
this kind of hate and anger? Our world
generates it faster than ever. Its roots
are in selfishness (https://www.lds.org/ensign/1988/09/dealing-with-anger-and-contention?lang=eng). The key then, as this article quoted says, is
to overcome selfishness. Admitting that
it isn’t all about me.
Quoting
from this article in a past Ensign: “The popular view of our day has been that
we are not responsible for our feelings; they just happen. In this view, other
people and events cause us to feel certain things, and so our only choice is
how we are going to show our anger.
“Burton
Kelly, however, points out that emotional responses like anger are actually
choices that we make. “For us to feel emotion,” he writes, “we must first be
aware of some stimulus—an event, a thought, a memory. Then we interpret that
stimulus—and that’s when the emotional response comes. Our interpretation can
be relatively positive, neutral, or negative.” (Ensign, Feb. 1980, p. 9.) The stimulus
itself has no inherent emotional charge; the emotion comes from within us
because of how we choose or are conditioned to see the stimulus.
“Thus,
to be angry is a choice we make; it is not “caused” by anything or anyone
outside ourselves. If we can teach our children, in both words and actions,
that choosing not to respond in anger is within our control, we will teach them
one of life’s most valuable lessons. September 1988 Ensign, Dealing with
Anger and Contention”.
Using
these quotes makes this less of my blog, but I like the ideas and agree with
them. Anger is a choice. I’ve watched my husband for 35 years and
anger is not part of his arsenal of tools he uses to navigate this world. Believe me, he has plenty of opportunities to
be angry. He will not go there. I’ve tried to emulate this behavior because
I’ve seen that it is a choice and its rewards are many. It has taken years, but I don’t get
angry. And now anger is something that
seems so foreign to me.
As
we view the behavior of Shiz and Coriantumr, it is easy to see the selfishness
of each. To Shiz, it was all about his
desire to get even for the death of his brother. Neither of them was willing to admit fault in
any way and was willing to sacrifice the lives of their entire associates (but
not self) . . . for what? What did
either one of them gain from this pathetic display of selfishness? The way I see it, they gained a whole lot of
trouble to deal with in the life after this one.
The
bottom line: We must learn to control
anger. We must avoid it like the
plague. It has the power to take us down
right along with those we are angry at.

No comments:
Post a Comment